Now that’s a title not all parts of which will resonate with all of you, but I can guarantee that my brother-in-law David will, as soon as he reads it, be unable to shake from his head the sound of Ken Dodd singing. Others of you will be reminded of Charles Schultz, and, more specifically, Snoopy.
Most of you, I hope, will have realised by now that today’s theme is happiness. Three events in the last seven days contrived to align in suggesting this topic to me. The first was Purim (which, depending on who and where you are, you celebrated either on Sunday or on Monday, or not at all). There has been lots of discussion in Israel in recent days about how we can celebrate Purim wholeheartedly this year. However, on the evidence of what I have seen and heard today, while there seems to be less of the not necessarily appropriate craziness that sometimes marks Purim, there has been much joy, as we take heart from the message of the Purim story.
Last week was marked by the UN’s International Day of Happiness, my second event. This day has been celebrated on March 20 every year since 2013, following a resolution initiated by Bhutan, of which more later. The third event I will come to much later in this blog.
So, how did you celebrate the International Day of Happiness (IDH) this year? Me too. Very little attention seems to be paid to the day itself, but rather more is paid to the annual World Happiness Report, which purported, this year, to rank 143 individual countries according to how happy their citizens are. Before we look at some of those ranks, we need to clarify some issues.
First, the score and, therefore, the ranking for the current year for each country actually represent the average of that country’s score for each of the previous three years: so, 2024’s score is an average of 2021–2023. Given what Israel has been through in 2023 and, so far, 2024, you might question how accurate a reflection of the current situation this year’s score and ranking are.
In addition, the UN’s view of national happiness is, some would argue, a controversial one. Their online announcement for IDH states: ‘Happiness is a fundamental human goal. The United Nations General Assembly recognizes this goal and calls for “a more inclusive, equitable and balanced approach to economic growth that promotes the happiness and well-being of all peoples.”’
It is arguable whether Bhutan would fully endorse this explanation of how to promote national happiness. Indeed, Bhutan’s adoption of happiness as a national value was quite consciously intended as a rejection of an economic definition of happiness. For at least 400 years, Bhutan’s legal code has recognised that, “if the government cannot create happiness for its people, then there is no purpose for government to exist”.
So, when, in the early 1970’s, His Majesty Jigme Singye Wangchuck, the Fourth King of Bhutan, promulgated the concept of Gross National Happiness (GNH), questioning whether the prevailing measurement system’s claim that Gross Domestic Product (GDP) alone could deliver happiness and well-being to society, he found a ready audience. When Bhutan became a democracy in 2008, the Constitution including the statement: “The State shall strive to promote those conditions that will enable the pursuit of Gross National Happiness.”
The measurement and screening of GNH in Bhutan considers 9 domains, divided into 38 sub-indexes, as shown in the following diagram. These domains reflect, among other things, the Buddhism that is a significant part of Bhutanese culture.
For the WHP, the criteria are a little different. The World Happiness Report is a partnership of Gallup, the Oxford Wellbeing Research Centre, the UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network, and the WHR’s Editorial Board. Their website gives insight into their methodology:
“Life evaluations from the Gallup World Poll provide the basis for the annual happiness rankings. They are based on answers to the main life evaluation question. The Cantril Ladder asks respondents to think of a ladder, with the best possible life for them being a 10 and the worst possible life being a 0. They are then asked to rate their own current lives on that 0 to 10 scale. The rankings are from nationally representative samples over three years.
“We use observed data on…six variables and estimates of their associations with life evaluations to explain the variation across countries. [These variables are] GDP per capita, social support, healthy life expectancy, freedom, generosity, and corruption. Our happiness rankings are not based on any index of these six factors – the scores are instead based on individuals’ own assessments of their lives, in particular, their answers to the single-item Cantril ladder life-evaluation question, much as epidemiologists estimate the extent to which life expectancy is affected by factors such as smoking, exercise, and diet.”
This highlights the third area that requires clarification. Just what is the WHP measuring? It labels that something ‘happiness’. However, the quotation in the last two paragraphs would suggest that what is being measured is not, as you might initially suspect, ‘joy’, but, rather, something like ‘satisfaction with one’s life’. If I were forced to offer a one-word definition, I might choose ‘fulfilment’.
Clearly, nobody would want to argue that material considerations are irrelevant to human happiness. However, you can certainly argue that these are not the only, nor even, perhaps, the most important, elements in determining fulfilment.
All of which may go some way to explaining some of the more surprising rankings in the 2024 (actually 32021-2023) table. Consider this, for example. Israel is ranked 6th happiest of the 143 countries. Among young people up to the age of 30, it is ranked 2nd, bettered only by Lithuania. Among those aged 60 and above, it is ranked 18th.
Incidentally, the corresponding rankings for US and UK are as follows:
Overall | Under 30s | Over 60s | |
US | 23rd | 62nd | 10th |
UK | 20th | 32nd | 20th |
Statistics are, unfortunately, not available for Bhutan, because “Bhutan was excluded from the 2021 report due to a technicality: Each country’s scores are based upon detailed Gallup polls, but Gallup did not conduct polling in Bhutan during the required timeframe.” This should mean that Bhutan will be included in 2025’s report (for the years 2022-2024), although conspiracy theorists may remain sceptical.
At this point, I’m going to stick my neck out, and offer an opinion for which I have no tangible evidence. I believe that Israel’s high rank is attributable to three separate key elements. The first is the important role that family plays in Israeli life. Both the nuclear and the extended family are nurtured and celebrated in Israeli national life.
To give one, perhaps trivial, example (and perhaps not). At the ceremony marking the start of Israel’s Independence Day every year, twelve individuals from various walks of life are honoured by being selected to light twelve beacons, representing the twelve tribes of Israel. Each honouree precedes the lighting by declaring in whose honour they are lighting: this might typically be, for example, a sector of public life such as the health service, or youth movements.
Each declaration follows a formula: it ends with the words: “and for the glory of Israel”, and begins along the lines of: “I, Jane Doe, daughter of Shimon, of blessed memory, and Dinah, may she live a long life”. In other words, those who have been singled out because of their life achievements, begin by acknowledging their parentage. This, of course, reflects the Jewish religious convention of naming.
The second key element is that Israel is a country whose citizens recognise and identify with a national purpose. We share and value a common past and seek to work towards a common future. Of course, this is not always obvious, and, national unity is not something that was much in evidence for the first nine months of 2023. However, as I may have pointed out before, both those demonstrating in support of the government’s plans for judicial reform, and those demonstrating against the government’s plan for judicial revolution marched under the national flag. They were united in their desire to achieve what they perceived as being best for the country.
Third is a strong sense of community. Both those who belong to a religious community, and those who are not religious, are very likely to feel a strong connection to, and responsibility towards, their local community. Neighbourly concern, supporting local charities, volunteering, are all typical throughout Israeli society.
That, at least, is my take. Now to come to the third event this past week that got me thinking about happiness/contentment/fulfilment. After a long hiatus, Micha’el uploaded a video to the family’s youtube channel. You can view it here. I recommend you view it now, and I promise to wait here until you come back.
Not the easiest watch, I’ll agree, although easier to watch than to make, I suspect. But my takeaway is this: because Tslil and Micha’el are committed to their vision, they are able to deal with the setbacks that they have faced. I hope you were able to see beyond the downbeat mood of the video and sense, obviously not joy, but the fulfilment of engagement with something that matters to you, or, for want of a better word, happiness. And if happiness can be not yet succeeding with your water pump, then I think you’re in an enviable place.